Palmers Solicitors, Author at Palmers Solicitors - Page 60 of 122
Twitter X
Palmers Solicitors

I’ve defaulted on a business loan payment – What assets are at risk?

I’ve defaulted on a business loan payment – What assets are at risk?

I’ve defaulted on a business loan payment – What assets are at risk?

It’s nothing something that many business owners want to think about, but consider the following scenario:

John Smith, owner of Company X, takes out a loan for his business and uses it to fund a new product range. He plans to use the profits from this range to repay the loan at a rate of £500 per month.

Contrary to Mr Smith’s robust financial plans, the new product fails to make enough income to repay the loan.

After meeting his essential business costs, John Smith must default on his loan as he cannot spare £500 from his business accounts per month.

His loan provider is forced to commence recovery proceedings – putting John’s assets at risk.

Take a look at the facts

John is an amalgamation of any number of business owners who have taken out a loan to grow their operations and, for a range of reasons, cannot make the agreed repayments.

Depending on the type of security John has granted to the lender, his assets may be a risk.

Assuming he has granted a legal charge, debenture and a personal guarantee, the assets that are at risk if he does not comply with the terms of the loan agreement and the security documents would be the property over which the legal charge has been granted and all of John’s assets (including all properties).

Ultimately any assets that John owns in his name personally could be at risk if the lender instigates bankruptcy proceedings against him.

When his lender decides to commence enforcement action, any costs associated with this (including the costs and expenses of an insolvency practitioner) will be added onto the loan and will be deducted from the proceeds of the sale of assets.

If there is a surplus, this will be repaid to John, although there is rarely a surplus once all sums due to the lender have been paid.

Depending on the terms of the loan, the lender may be entitled to charge default interest if John fails to pay the loan.

In some circumstances, the lender could even charge a management fee for the time it takes the lender to manage John’s account.

Banking and Finance Associate Solicitor, Dashna Morarji-Sagoo, concludes: “In my experience, in order to prevent the lender from enforcing the security, it is best for borrowers to communicate with the lender and be transparent, otherwise there could be severe costs implications and assets put at risk.”

We can provide impartial, straightforward advice to anyone considering taking out a loan where there is increased risk to their business or assets.

Contact Dashna Morarji-Sagoo by emailing DashnaMorarji-Sagoo@palmerslaw.co.uk or calling 01375 484443 or BJ Chong by emailing BJChong@palmerslaw.co.uk

The contents of this article are intended for informational and educational purposes only.

Are assets always distributed according to a valid Will?

Are assets always distributed according to a valid Will?

When you create a Will, you do so on the understanding that your estate will be administered according to your wishes, so long as the Will is valid under the law.

This means that you are free to leave your assets to the people or organisations of your choosing, whether that be family, friends or a charity.

However, there are certain circumstances in which those not detailed in your Will may seek to make a claim against your estate. You’ll need to understand these and seek advice on drafting your Will in order to avoid disputes after your death.

Claims by dependents

The primary situation where claims may be made against your estate in addition to those detailed in your Will is when dependents claim under the Inheritance (Provisions for Family & Dependents) Act 1975.

The Act allows certain categories of people which have a relationship with you to make a claim where they feel that your Will fails to make sufficient provisions for them.

Claims may be made by:

  • A spouse or civil partner, whether separated from you or not
  • An unmarried former spouse
  • Someone who has cohabited with you for two years prior to, and immediately up until, your death
  • A child, whether biological or adopted
  • A stepchild or someone else you treated as a child
  • Someone who was fully or significantly financially dependent on you immediately before your death.

The Courts will decide what classes as ‘sufficient and reasonable’ provisions, taking into account circumstances such as the size of your estate, the needs of the claiming party and any existing obligations you hold towards them.

Claims under promises made and broken

If you have promised financial support to someone after your death, but your Will does not reflect this, then the person may be able to make a claim against your estate under promissory estoppel.

This is the concept within the law that states one party may be liable for financial harm as a result of broken promises.

The Courts may intervene in such a case, provided that the individual is able to prove that you made the promise, that it was not met, and that they have suffered financial harm as a result of relying on that promise.

Securing your Will

Want to make sure your assets are distributed according to your Will? The best way to achieve this is to anticipate whether your Will might trigger any claims in either of the above scenarios.

If you have someone who relies on you financially or family members which are classed as dependents, you should first consider how you can provide sufficient support for them in your Will – or the reasoning behind not wanting to do so.

It is your right to distribute your assets according to your own wishes, but it is also a good idea to identify why you have not made provisions for certain dependents in case a dispute arises.

This is also a discussion that you can have with your dependents while drafting your Will, if this is appropriate to your situation.

Whatever your circumstances and family dynamic, we can advise you on drafting a Will that works for you and your dependents. Contact our Wills and Probate team to discuss how we can help.

I’m a new driver – Are there any restrictions on my driving?

I’m a new driver – Are there any restrictions on my driving?

Achieving a new driving licence is an exciting milestone for anyone, but the law recognises that new drivers are at an increased risk of a collision due to a lack of experience.

A number of proposals have been made by the Government and legal campaigners to introduce restrictions on drivers within the first six months or first year – as new drivers are not currently restricted on how or when they drive.

Youth or experience?

One such suggestion included banning new drivers under the age of 25 from carrying other under-25s as passengers in the first year of having their licence.

However, such a ban does not fully address the issue of safety among new drivers, as it seems to target young drivers rather than new ones.

We understand the reasoning behind it, since we are no strangers to cases where incidents are fuelled by drivers distracted by friends, alcohol culture and inexperience in decision-making – but it fails to tackle the roots of the issue.

Research by AutoTrader suggests that new drivers are now at an average age of 26. An individual who starts driving at this age has no more experience on the road than one aged 17, so any change to the law would need to reflect this lack of experience, rather than penalising only young new drivers.

Six points and you’re out

The only restriction that currently exists for new drivers is not relating to how they drive or whether they drive with passengers or not, but to the points system.

The points system is a way of penalising certain driving offences without immediately punishing offenders, rather cautioning them against committing the offence again.

Most drivers will receive an automatic driving ban of at least six months when they receive 12 or more points.

However, under the New Drivers Act, drivers within the first two years will lose their licence after receiving six points – and will have to retake both the theory and practical tests in order to be able to drive again.

We should also note that the use of a mobile phone while operating a vehicle now carries a six-point penalty, so doing so could get a new driver banned for a single offence.

We specialise in road traffic law and can advise you on your rights and obligations as a driver. Contact our team to find out how we can help you.

Birdnesting – A smart strategic move to maintain family stability?

Birdnesting – A smart strategic move to maintain family stability?

We all know how difficult it can be when a couple decide to divorce or end a civil partnership, or cohabiting relationship particularly when children are involved.

However, with around 42 per cent of marriages in the UK now ending in divorce, and with half of these involving children under the age of 16, it is a part of life that requires a normality all of its own.

This has led to the advent of birdnesting, the latest approach to family living arrangements following a divorce or separation.

Under this arrangement, separated partners retain the main family home and purchase a smaller rented residence such as a flat. Each parent lives with the children in the house for a set period, often switching places weekly.

During this time, the other lives in the smaller property, while the children consistently live in the main home to minimise their disruption.

This may seem like a strange approach to post-separation living arrangements, but family law practitioners are seeing a marked increase in its popularity – and it’s becoming clear why.

A modern approach to co-parenting

Under UK family law, each child has two parents with parental responsibility – typically the child’s biological mother and the child’s biological father as listed on the birth certificate.

A significant part of parental responsibility is the requirement to provide a safe home for the child, which can be made more difficult when parents separate, as this can result in:

  • A decrease in total household income
  • The sale of a family home
  • Conflict over assets, which may include a property

Beyond this requirement, many parents will each want to spend time with their children and take an active role in their protection and upbringing.

Unfortunately, the housing market is not conducive to purchasing a second family home, particularly in areas where housing costs are steep like the South East.

Birdnesting offers a more cost-effective alternative to maintaining two family homes. It adds only the cost of renting a small property to the cost of running the family home, rather than purchasing a second.

It also offers a way for parents to meet their parental responsibilities while maintaining stability in a child’s life.

Maintaining stability in more ways than one

One of the most significant ways that divorce or separation impacts children is through disruption to their lives.

Moving between houses to spend time with one parent or the other is a major contributor to this, as well as the resulting distress from losing their familiar home, changing schools or losing touch with friends.

Stability and reducing disruption are arguably at the core of much of the legislation surrounding children’s matters – the requirement to regularly attend school, parental responsibility, protection from harm – so it is a strong argument in favour of a birdnesting arrangement.

The challenges of birdnesting

However, birdnesting is only suitable in certain situations.

It requires substantial financial ties between former spouses as they continue to own a property together, and have to navigate who pays what in terms of mortgage, rent and utility bills, food, which may not be appropriate when a separation has not been amicable.

This could, in fact, lead to further disputes and ultimately have a negative impact on the wellbeing of the children involved.

A continued financial relationship may also make divorce proceedings and asset separation more complex, although this can be worked around if a birdnesting arrangement is mutually agreeable to both parties.

Finally, there is the question of other relationships. If one parent enters a new relationship, there will need to be a discussion over whether the new partner is permitted to stay in the main home and whether the arrangement can continue if one parent wishes to move away from the area.

A verdict on birdnesting

Birdnesting has the potential to be a revolution in how parents live with and see their children after a divorce or separation.

That said, it absolutely must be a voluntary and collaborative arrangement. Otherwise, it is likely to fail and cause the very disruption it aims to avoid.

As with any separation, arrangements between parents should be detailed and all-encompassing, to include:

  • Co-parenting arrangements
  • Who bears the responsibility for which costs
  • Time spent in the main home/with the children
  • Rules for guests and family within the main home
  • Rules for holidays and overseas travel

Ultimately, it is an innovative concept that reflects the changing attitudes to divorce in the UK as something which is to be accepted and worked around.

While it is certainly not the only co-parenting solution which prioritises the needs of the children, where a birdnesting arrangement is in place and functioning, it is indicative of a wider respect between parents and a willingness to put the good of the child first.

For advice on living arrangements and children’s matters after a divorce or separation, please contact me at KarenBishop@palmerslaw.co.uk.

Mrs B, Hockley

Helen Jago – Many thanks for all your help and hard work and keeping costs down in respect of the LPA’s and Probate. I will certainly recommend your services if anyone I know has need of legal services.  It was my brother-in-law who recommended Palmers to me as he was more than happy with the legal services he had received.