Press Release, Author at Palmers Solicitors - Page 7 of 11
Twitter X
Palmers Solicitors

Palmers Solicitors gets in the spirit for World Kindness Day

Palmers Solicitors gets in the spirit for World Kindness Day

Palmers Solicitors gets in the spirit for World Kindness Day

Essex-based Palmers Solicitors showed its appreciation for its dedicated team on World Kindness Day (13 November), gifting all its staff members with a fantastic bag of goodies! 

Getting in the spirit of the day, the firm presented each team member with a surprise gift bag to spread some positivity and recognise its staff for their outstanding work and client support.  

Each bag contained a range of goodies, including a reusable water bottle as well as some tasty sweet treats! 

Founded in 1998 by the World Kindness Movement, an international coalition of national kindness organisations, World Kindness Day encourages individuals, organisations and businesses to focus on the power of community and uniting acts of kindness.  

Practice Manager, Gina Newman, said: “We’re big believers in the power of positivity and kindness for everyone, from our team to the local community! 

“We’re proud to recognise our incredible team for their work and dedication throughout the year. Our talented colleagues are what makes Palmers what it is today! 

“This World Kindness Day has been an excellent an opportunity for us to celebrate the positive impact that small acts of kindness and support can have, whether it’s through client work, volunteering, community work or simply showing appreciation for each other.” 

Palmers Solicitors continues investment in talent with key promotion

Lorna Boorman, Palmers Private Client solicitor

Leading Essex-based law firm, Palmers Solicitors, has made another significant investment in its talented team with the promotion of Lorna Boorman to Associate Solicitor.

With over 10 years of experience in estate planning, Wills, trusts, probate and older client services, Lorna joined the firm in 2023 – making a splash in the department as a solicitor and building her own client base.

Stepping into her new role, Lorna is spearheading an internal initiative to boost cross-team collaboration and communication with a view to creating opportunities for the firm’s growth and further investment in skills.

Lorna will also continue to market and develop the firm’s Private Client service line at its South Woodham Ferrers Office, focusing on building relationships in the local area.

The move comes as the firm’s Private Client team undergoes significant growth – a demonstration of Palmers Solicitor’s dedication to the community and local people.

Donna Smy, Supervising Department Director in the firm’s Private Client team, said: “Lorna is a hugely valued and successful member of our team, so it’s an honour to offer her this opportunity and have her continue her career with us.

“Her promotion is thoroughly well-deserved and a sign of her talent, skills and standing within the team.

“However, it also marks a wider drive to grow our Private Client offering and further enhance what we offer to people in the community – whether that be planning their estate, writing their Will or helping loved ones through the probate process.

“This comes back to our fantastic team. We’re all exceptionally proud of the work we do and our shared approach to professional development and peer support – and we will certainly look to continue investing in our staff!”

Your guide to the Employment Rights Bill

Your guide to the Employment Rights Bill

A mix of measures have been suggested in the Employment Rights Bill which was recently published by the new Labour Government.

The majority of these measures, however, will not come into force for some time. The Bill is essentially an overview and much of the detail is not yet known. The majority of the provisions are either subject to consultation or require regulations to provide the detail.

As such there is only a limited amount of preparation for the new provisions coming into force that can be undertaken at present.

As expected, these provisions include the suggestion that unfair dismissal would become a day-one claim (a claim that you can bring without any specific qualifying period of service).

Currently, an employee must have 2 years’ continuous service to bring a claim for unfair dismissal, although this is reduced in some instances. The new day-one right will be subject to a probationary period. At present, there is no real detail of how this would work.

The Bill provides for details to be given by way of regulations (which have yet to be published). The Government has indicated that it is proposing a 9-month probationary period. It seems during this period a ‘lighter-touch process’ would apply. Although it appears that this will not apply in respect of redundancy dismissals and will be limited to capability or conduct-related dismissals.

In the Government’s publication Next Steps to Make Work Pay, it suggested that the process should include a meeting with the employee to discuss concerns about their performance. Although no further details have been given to date.

The Bill includes provisions to limit potential compensation for successful unfair dismissal claims during the probationary period. The government has committed to consulting on whether lower compensation should be awarded to claims brought in respect of unfair dismissal during the probationary period.

At present, it seems that these reforms are unlikely to take effect prior to Autumn 2026. As such, although employers need to be aware of the upcoming changes and will need to ensure their policies and systems are ready prior to the implementation, it will be a case of waiting for the regulations in order to be able to fully prepare for the change.

The Bill will introduce a right to guaranteed hours for zero-hours or low-hours workers reflecting the hours workers have worked during a reference period.  It is thought that this period may be 12 weeks.

A right to reasonable notice of shifts and to payment for shifts cancelled or curtailed at short notice has also been included in the Bill.

A consultation seeking views on how to apply these measures to agency workers commenced on 21 October 2024. There is likely to be a further consultation on the more general implementation of these measures.

Employers should begin considering how these measures will impact their business if they utilise zero-hours or low-hours workers.

It may be that some of those workers, on review, should be classified as part-time workers rather than zero-hours workers. It seems likely that it will be some time before these measures come into force.

The Bill amends the thresholds for when the need to collectively consult arises. The Government has said that it remains ‘committed to consult on lifting the cap of the protective award if an employer is found to not have properly followed the collective redundancy process’.

The Bill includes provisions which make dismissals unfair where the principal reason for dismissal is that an individual did not agree to an employer’s requested variation of their contract of employment.

There is a limited exception where the employer is in financial difficulty which is affecting or likely in the immediate future to affect the employer’s ability to carry on the business.

As a result of this a further consultation commenced on 21 October 2024: ‘Making Work Pay: Consultation on strengthening remedies against abuse of rules on collective redundancy and fire and rehire’. Employers should review the terms of their contracts of employment currently as if there is the need to consider amendments to the contracts of employment, it may be wise to consider these before the new provisions come into force.

The Bill removes the current waiting period of 3 days in respect of statutory sick pay. It also removes the current qualifying periods of employment for paternity leave and parental leave.

It includes provisions which will make flexible working requests harder for employers to refuse as employers will only be permitted to refuse on specified grounds (which is the current position) but also only if it is reasonable to refuse on those grounds.

The employer will need to explain why it believes that reason applies and why it considers it reasonable to refuse the request.

There are also numerous provisions in respect of trade unions which strengthen their position.

The provisions regarding unfair dismissal are likely to have a significant impact on many employers, particularly those with employees who have shorter periods of service.

Currently, it is not clear what the process will be to dismiss someone during that period but it appears that there will be some form of process.

Presently, so long as the employee does not have the benefit of a claim for automatic unfair dismissal, a discrimination claim or a claim that does not require the standard period of continuous service for an unfair dismissal claim, an employer can dismiss an employee at any point before they reach the continuous service requirement, without reason and without following any form of process as long as the employee is given or paid in lieu of their notice period.

Employers may wish to look to strengthen their recruitment processes to ensure as far as possible the correct employee is employed initially.

They may also need to keep more detailed records of any concerns regarding employees during the probationary period and go through a more formal process in respect of any performance concerns, although it will be necessary to review the regulations regarding this when they are published to ascertain exactly what is required.

At present, employers cannot do much more to prepare than review their processes as the requirements for the ‘light-touch’ process to be used during the probationary period are not yet known.

The change to unfair dismissal and those changes impacting zero-hours workers are likely to be the ones that impact the largest number of employers.

The Government estimates that approximately 9 million additional employees will be entitled to bring claims for unfair dismissal under the new rules. At present, however, it is a case of ‘watch this space’!

Latest Legal 500 rankings reflect Palmers Solicitors’ diverse legal expertise

Latest Legal 500 rankings reflect Palmers Solicitors’ diverse legal expertise

Palmers Solicitors, providing personal and commercial legal services across Essex and beyond, has once again been ranked in the prestigious Legal 500 Guide – achieving recognition across six practice areas.

Based on rigorous research, Legal 500 is one of the most highly regarded guides to legal services and expertise.

Palmers Solicitors has been recognised as a leader within a diverse range of practice areas, signifying the firm’s dedication to excellence and client experience.

It has been ranked in:

  • Corporate and Commercial – Tier 3
  • Commercial Litigation – Tier 2
  • Family – Tier 4
  • Personal Tax, Trusts and Probate – Tier 2
  • Commercial Property – Tier 2
  • Construction – Tier 2

The firm has either maintained or exceeded its previous rankings in all of these practice areas.

In addition to its broader expertise, several of the firm’s individual experts have been featured in the rankings, including:

  • Helen Jago, Personal Tax, Trusts and Probate – Leading Partner
  • Matthew Johnson, Corporate and Commercial – Leading Associate
  • Adam Davis, Construction – Leading Partner
  • Luke Morgan, Commercial Litigation – Next Generation Partner

Practice Manager, Gina Newman, said: “We are all delighted with the latest Legal 500 rankings. These achievements are a real demonstration of the expertise and dedication of our team, so a huge congratulations to everyone who contributed to our success.

“I would also like to extend our sincere thanks to the clients who provided invaluable feedback to the Legal 500 researchers, for their help and for their continued support.

“Legal 500 is highly respected across the legal profession, and we never underestimate the power of being ranked consistently – but we’re not resting on our laurels!

“We’re always committed to enhancing our approach and delivering excellent service and outstanding client experiences.”

To speak to one of our experts and access our services, please contact us.

Palmers Solicitors helps cadet soar with RAF award sponsorship

Palmers Solicitors helps cadet soar with RAF award sponsorship

Essex-based Palmers Solicitors sponsored the Most Improved Cadet Award at the 1476 Squadron RAF Cadets presentation evening – continuing its committed support of the local community.

Held at the spectacular Vulcan Restoration Trust on Friday 27 September, the event recognised the success and achievements of young people in the Squadron, one of the many ways in which the group helps its cadets reach their full potential.

Representing Palmers Solicitors, Supervising Directors Erin Cronin and Helen Jago were proud to present the award for Most Improved Cadet to Toby Aitkin, in light of his outstanding achievements this year.

The event was doubly special for the attendees, as they were also able to celebrate the career and retirement of Richard Jennings, former Civilian Instructor at the RAF cadets.  

Speaking on the evening, Erin said: “It was a huge honour for us as a firm to sponsor the award, and for Helen and I to have the opportunity to present it to a very deserving winner!

“Events and groups like these have so much to offer to young people, helping them to celebrate their achievements and realise their potential.

“It was an incredible evening. Congratulations to Toby and, of course, good luck to Richard in his retirement.

“It’s important for local businesses to sponsor them when they can so that they can keep going – and it’s also a great opportunity to get involved with the local community!”

Sentencing Huw Edwards: Clarifying the legal position

Sentencing Huw Edwards: Clarifying the legal position

Jeremy Sirrell, Supervising Director, Palmers Solicitors

The sentencing of former BBC broadcaster, Huw Edwards, has received significant media coverage and online comment, with many people expressing discontent about the fact that Edwards escaped prison.

Criticism suggests that he received more lenient treatment than would ordinarily have been the case, with some critics specifically highlighting his fame as a cause.

Such commentary is entirely wrong if we take a closer look at the law. As expected, Huw Edwards was sentenced in accordance with current sentencing guidelines in relation to these kinds of offences.

Categorising the offence

Indecent images are divided into three different categories: A, B and C, with category A being the most serious and C being the least serious. Possessing indecent images is a very serious offence in British Criminal Law and one which is often dealt with by way of prison sentences.

The starting point for possession of a category A indecent image is one year of imprisonment. For distribution, the starting point is three years’ imprisonment. To produce such an image, the starting point is six years’ imprisonment.

The English Criminal Law treats indecent images of children very seriously.

However, there are factors that the law must consider when imposing a sentence, including:

  • Any previous convictions
  • Remorse
  • In the case of indecent images, other surrounding factors including the number of images.

Huw Edwards had 41 indecent images, which is an extremely low number in the context of other cases in this area of the law. Due to the nature of the internet, it is extremely easy to obtain huge numbers of images, and most of those appearing before the court will have images numbered in the thousands or more.

The number of images that Edwards possessed may, therefore, have been a material factor in sentencing.

Suspended sentencing

Another matter to consider is that, although Edwards did not go to prison immediately, he has received a custodial sentence.

He received a custodial sentence of six months, suspended for two years.

Should Mr Edwards fail to comply with any requirements imposed on him for those two years, for example reporting to probation, then he will be in breach of that suspended sentence and will serve his six-month sentence in prison.

The guidelines for possession

Some commentators have suggested that the sentencing guidelines are inappropriate and given leniency, handing down sentences that are too light for this kind of offence.

However, the position here is that lengthy custodial sentences are imposed for those who are involved in the distribution or production of these images – although possession can also lead to a custodial sentence.

We can see then that, while many criticisms can be made of the law in this area, undue leniency for Edwards is not one of them.

For advice on criminal law, please contact Jeremy.